Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Graphically Speaking: Dark Horse Goes Noir



Words by Miles Archer

Few storytelling genres can leave me as completely gripped as a great crime story can. I’ll never turn down a chance to read a hardboiled detective novel by Dashiell Hammett or Raymond Chandler or to check out a film noir like Chinatown or Double Indemnity. But my affection for this genre runs deeper than the classic, even clichéd devices it employs to sell books and movie tickets – the tough guys, the femme fatales, the cynically-related narrative, the twisting plots, the sex and violence. What is most compelling about these stories is that beneath the grim and gritty surface, every good crime story forces us to ask ourselves how far we would go for personal gain, or to protect ourselves and those we love. Answering that question allows authors to plumb the very deepest fathoms of the human soul while escalating the stakes for their characters to life and death levels. When crafted by a true master, the potential for sublime tragedy in such tales is, dare I say it, Shakespearean in magnitude – indeed, if the Bard were alive and working today, the Montague and Capulet families might have resembled the Corleones and Barzinis; Hamlet might have seemed a lot more like Sam Spade or Jake Giddes, and a lot less like an existential pussy.

While Shakespeare never had the opportunity to pen a noir tale, crime fiction maestros like Hammett and Chandler left their own legacy which today is carried on most proudly in comics. Creators like Frank Miller (Sin City), Brian Azzarello (100 Bullets), Ed Brubaker and Sean Phillips (Criminal), Jason Aaron (Scalped) and others have won critical and fan acclaim for their work in this paradigm over the last twenty years, giving comic sales a much-needed shot in the arm in the process. Noir: A Collection of Crime Comics is a moodily-shadowed celebration of these recent successes, and a nod to the genre that helped to launch comics as a viable commercial enterprise more than seventy-five years ago.

Published by Dark Horse, Noir is a 116-page digest-sized crime comic anthology, with each story fittingly illustrated in black and white, and the entire volume bound by a cover as black as the tales contained within. The writing and artwork were contributed by a host of creators who bring a full clip’s worth of experience in crime fiction to the table, and who approach the genre using a variety of different visual and narrative styles. The good folks at Dark Horse crammed thirteen stories into this volume, so economy in storytelling was crucial to achieving any level of depth in the eight-to-ten pages allotted to each.

That depth was most difficult to attain in stories featuring characters that exist in their own ongoing series, such as the Mister X story “Yacht on the Styx” by Dean Motter and the Kane one-shot “The Card Player” by Paul Grist. As someone who had never read a Mister X or Kane story prior to picking up Noir, I needed to come away from these stories with an understanding of who those main characters are. These particular stories selected by Motter and Grist were not able to convey that, nor did they seek to explore of the dark or dangerous aspects of human existence as I would expect a crime or noir tale to do. However, it should be noted that Motter’s artwork for “Yacht on the Styx” was stunning, and the variety of tones and textures he was able to achieve in a black and white format is reason alone to read the story.

Two of the more successful stories from Noir came from Stray Bullets creator David Lapham and the writer/artist team of Gary Philips and Eduardo Barreto. In “Open the Goddamn Box,” Lapham’s heroine protagonist expounds upon the destructive side of the male adolescent psyche from the inside of a locked steamer trunk, then cleverly uses that knowledge to turn the tables on her captors and would-be rapists to ironically horrific effect.

Phillips’ married and overweight female protagonist in “The New Me” works with her philandering physical trainer to drop some extra pounds. Once she’s become trim and fit enough for the trainer to turn his amorous charms on her, she lures him back to her place and strips him of literally all that he has. This one gets a bit sci-fi for a noir story, but it works in this case and allows Phillips to explore what could happen when the desire to stay fit and young-looking is taken to extremes.


But the true dramatic power of the genre is best demonstrated in two stories contributed by the noir masters who put crime comics back on the map this decade. “21st Century Noir,” a Criminal short story by series creators Ed Brubaker and Sean Phillips, is a fatalistic take on the world of Internet dating. Brubaker’s shifting of perspective in the course of the story from the young single male to the older married woman he meets online and again to her cuckolded husband, brilliantly illustrates how difficult it is for a person to understand the true motives of someone he or she meets anonymously via the Internet. Phillips’ shadowy yet realistic visuals pair perfectly with Brubaker’s trademark hard-boiled narrative to carry the story to its chilling conclusion.

In the anthology’s final story, 100 Bullets creator Brian Azzarello teams with Brazilian artists Fábio Moon and Gabriel Bá for “The Bad Night,” a noir retelling of a classic comic origin story. That’s really the extent of what I can divulge about the story itself without giving too much away, though I can comment that it is concisely told, and the dialogue is as gritty and realistic as you would expect from an Azzarello yarn. Moon and Bá’s style is less realistic and more iconic, and the dramatic profiles cast by their characters’ angular faces are well-suited for a noir tale.

As a whole, I enjoyed the stories in Noir and feel that they are a good overall representation of the crime comic genre. Like most short story anthologies this one was a somewhat mixed bag, but there are some real gems here that make it worth picking up, especially if you like your comics short on sentiment and long on depravity and black India ink. However, I do hope that if Dark Horse sees fit to publish a second Noir anthology at some point in the future, that they will include some kind of take on the hardboiled detective story, and possibly an introductory essay on noir and crime comics written by a luminary like Frank Miller. But until then, this is still an anthology which Miller would almost certainly have fun reading.
Somewhere, Hammett and Chandler are smiling.


Miles Archer loves crime comics, old school hip-hop and The Super-Friends. He has profiled some very interesting artists in film, music, fashion and comics for publications such as Mixer, Mass Appeal, YRB and Big Shot. He doesn’t have his own website yet, but hopes you won’t think any less of him as a person because of it. He lives in Harlem with his wife and what must be the last standard-definition television on the eastern seaboard.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Graphically Speaking: Andy Diggle's Daredevil

Words: Christopher Irving

For the first time since about 1994, I'm going to quit picking up Daredevil.


The reason? The new found level of mediocrity on the title. Under the new creative team of writer Andy Diggle and penciler Robert De La Torre Daredevil has, after two months, left me missing $6 spent.
Daredevil's last direction, under writer Ed Brubaker and artist Michael Lark, ended with Daredevil taking over the ninja clan The Hand, operating under New York City. How cool is a superhero in charge of countless ninjas? Pretty damn cool, you'd think.

Not feeling it under Diggle's new tenure.

Let's count the ways, but be warned that there are spoilers:

Don't start a new direction from a one-shot stemming out of a crossover. Daredevil #501 starts with Daredevil feeling the ramifications of Bullseye killing a building full of people. That's great, maybe if you picked Daredevil: The List but, if you're a new reader, you're totally lost (which, in all fairness, is probably an editorial call). Hell, we even get five pages of expository dialogue from Foggy Nelson to catch us "new readers" up that slows the story down inexorably. The run starts with #501: it should stand on it's own.

Know the characters. Kingpin didn't become a criminal mastermind by trusting anyone, right? Then why is he spilling his plan to his underling, Lady Bullseye? There's even a point in #502 where he gets the Owl's underlings to take over the now-crippled villain's racket, but only if they report to him instead. If he really wants to set enemies against one another, why not just get the idea in their head, and let them go? Or, if he wants to appear as if he's really "lost his nerve", why not let the Owl's lieutenants walk out of his office thinking they're in charge, without having Lady Bullseye behead one of them?

Don't be predictable. Master Izo is apparently killed by Daredevil at the end of #501. We find out, next issue, that Izo just slowed his heart rate down. Old ninja trick, one of the oldest ninja tricks in the annals of books about ninjas (I know Batman's done it before, and probably Storm Shadow in G.I. Joe). Seriously, this is The Hand, an apparently merciless and highly trained ninja clan. Wouldn't they expect something like this? And, even then, wouldn't they want to do something much more harsh like behead Izo?

Show it, don't say it. Daredevil claims he has to be sneaky about not really killing Izo to prove himself to the Hand, but this is the kicker -- we're only told the Hand is keeping an eye on Daredevil, but we're not seeing it. A simple plot device like putting an elder of The Hand in New York to keep an eye on him would create tension.

Another thing: the opening recap page claims Daredevil plans to "take back the streets of New York from Osborn's corruption". He has a ninja clan at his behest, and he's determined to clean NYC up. Why is it that we don't see him even trying until the last page of #502? And why isn't he looking for legal ways to trap these corrupt judges and cops? Even if he isn't being Matt Murdock anymore, he does have that estranged friend Foggy and that reporter friend Ben Urich to turn evidence obtained by ninjas to.

Make us care. Foggy is defending someone, and a corrupt judge overrules the jury's verdict (which may or may not even be legally possible); do we even know the name of Foggy's client? No. We have no emotional investment of that specific character and, when Foggy blows up and has to be walked out in cuffs, we have no incentive to care or even understand what he's really fighting for.

What about Daredevil? We're not really shown much Matt Murdock, other than a rather aimless dream sequence that warns Matt of his own self-destruction (something we're not seeing enough of, either). Kingpin, who Brubaker fleshed out into an incredible character, becomes a one-note Snidley Whiplash criminal mastermind character that we have no reason to care for (and, yes, we should care for the badguys, as well). Even the crooked cops at the end of #502 read like bit parts from an '80s action movie ("See, you die resistin' arrest, we get a commendation an' a big fat raise.").

At the end of #502, Daredevil goes after a handful of crooked cops with about a dozen ninjas. Seems to me, one Daredevil could clean half a dozen badguys up on his own. Why have a ridiculous amount of back-up, other than for a bad-ass splash page?

Yes, I admit, I'm being a tad harsh on the book. That's true, but I don't feel any of it's undeserved. The last time I stopped forking out money for Daredevil, it was after the suit of armor and the Jack Battlin alter ego happened. It was beyond bad. I picked it back up when Kesel and Nord had their under rated run, and even stuck through the Joe Kelly and Gene Colan issues, welcoming the Marvel Knights' injection of awesomeness. I've realized that Daredevil is the only book I've picked up, no matter how broke I was at the time (and the only superhero book I've consistently bought), for about fourteen years.

Diggle may be a good writer on books like Thunderbolts, Green Arrow, and The Losers --
and he may deliver great Daredevil issues a year from now. But, at the end of the day, a good comic book writer makes it work with their first issue. Kevin Smith did it. David Mack did, as well. So did Brian Michael Bendis and Ed Brubaker. But right now, I'm going to have to drop Daredevil, because I definitely won't spend any more money on a book that may or may not "become good".

Each issue should deliver enough story that gives incentive to come back for more: that's just good comic book writing.

But I really hope they keep De La Torre on for a long time. That guy's work kicks ass.

Friday, November 13, 2009

Diario de Peter Kuper: From World War 3 to Spy vs Spy

Words: Christopher Irving . Pictures: Seth Kushner

“I just say [I’m a] plain ol’ cartoonist. It’s a real conversation starter –‘You’re a what?—A Cartoonist? Cool, that must be fun! ’At least, that is more true these days. “Before people would assume I did Superman or Garfield, then move quickly away. “Now they at least pause before asking if I do Superman or Garfield and moving quickly away.”

Wooden masks line one wall of Peter Kuper’s Upper West Side studio, masks from his other countries, some masks authentic, and others crafted by Peter himself.

It’s a warm day, and the diverse artist has just shortly enjoyed the release of Diaria de Oaxaca, his journal that outlines the two years he lived in the Mexican city with his wife and young daughter. The newest issue of World War 3 Illustrated, a magazine that’s still indy in a mainstream world, also just came back from press. Throughout all of this, he still maintains the art chores on the iconic Spy Vs. Spy for Mad Magazine.

All of these new things are popping, and Kuper’s biggest challenge may just be readjusting to life in America.

“When we finally returned to New York from Mexico, the transition was very difficult,” he admits later in the interview. “On the plus side were the elections and the end of the Bush administration, but that was hand in hand the mess they left and the financial crash. On top of this, both my parents died which had my head spinning. I also went through some artistic shifts from the Mexican experience that I am still sorting through as I try to explore new directions with my work in this difficult economy. Bottom line, transitions are a bitch!”

Kuper’s diverse body of work keeps him from being pushed into a category: his work includes political cartoons, graphic novel adaptations of classic books, fine art, autobio comics, and even children’s books. His time in Mexico, told in a series of essays and illustration in Diario, adds journalism to the mix.


“It covers the two years we spent in Oaxaca, Mexico, a small town way in the south of Mexico,” Peter says. “We went there originally and primarily to expose our daughter to a second language, and to get away from everything after our 2004 ‘elections’, as they were. I was ready for a little time out. Also, when I was ten, my father had a sabbatical and we moved to Israel for a year. It was part of my sense of an important the learning curve for a kid. My wife and I were talking about it for years, and that we’d do it before our daughter was eleven, because it’s so much easier to learn another language before that age.”

“It’s brilliant to know another language,” he then reflects. “It just opens a door on a secret world of communication. I’m only sorry that I don’t know more languages myself.”

Kuper has gained a worldly status, from his sabbatical to Israel as a young boy, to various trips through Southeast Asia and Africa as an adult. The exposure to various cultures, as well as the permanence of his Israel trip, was an inspiration for his daughter’s upbringing.

“I’m still working on my English!” Peter jokes. “Spanish I’m passable, I know some Hebrew. I went back to Israel a few times over the years and what I learned when I was a kid came back to me. When I saw the animated film Waltz with Bashir, which is in Hebrew, I found that listening to it and reading subtitles my forgotten Hebrew was coming back to me.”


What was meant to be a relaxing trip from American culture and politics, from wars on terror to fishily reelected Presidents, into the simpler life of Oaxaca, turned out to be a larger experience than Peter and his wife had ever bargained for:

“We moved down there for what we thought would be a break, and it turned out that the town was in the middle of a political explosion. There was a teacher’s strike that expanded into an international incident when an American journalist was killed a few months after we arrived. There were 4,500 federal troops flown in to quell the strike and the whole city was under siege. That defined the first six months that we were there—so much for escape! Though we had another year and a half in Mexico, and the rest of the time wasn’t as fraught.

“That time period was an incredible opportunity for me to draw everything, and got back in touch with drawing in my sketchbook as I had on previous jaunts around the world before our daughter was born.”


Despite the craziness of the Kupers’ first half-year, it only helped to bolster Peter’s art, and did provide them with the much-needed removal from American society.

“The timing was, in fact, great since the events of the strike allowed me to apply my art in a way I’ve always wanted and our time in Mexico was before the world economic crash,” Peter reflects. “Even given the turmoil, were in our little pre-crash bubble down there and able to worked full-time and send our work back to the US by e-mail.”

Being in Oaxaca, Peter wasn’t completely removed from American society: he continued to work on Spy Vs. Spy, as well as other illustration jobs that came his way. He also had two books come out – Stop Forgetting to Remember (which was finished early in their move) and children’s book Theo and the Blue Note. At most, he was continuing an on-again, off-again relationship with America and the rest of the world.

“I was also called to do more talks than ever before while I was down in Mexico, so I found myself flying back and forth to the United States and Europe,” Peter admits. “I was invited to Belgium with Scott Macleod and Kevin Huizenga, Angouleme in France and came to NYC to promote my books a few times. I also had a brief residency at the University North Dakota during a writer’s conference, which included being on panels with Salmon Rushdie and Junot Díaz, which was a thrilling experience.”

By getting mental snapshots and personal glimpses of the United States on his occasional trips back, it gave Kuper the unique perspective of a familiar outsider.


“Sometimes it was happy to get a shot of New York City and the American scene, but there were other times when I came back and felt like the 21st century was racing forward, and I wanted to move slower,” he notes. “It was the feeling that everyone has a cell phone, and that everyone has an iPod and society is going to hell in a hand basket. In Oaxaca the pace was just slower, though it wasn’t devoid of modernity. It’s a pretty cosmopolitan town for being from the 16th century. On several of my visits home I felt like things were really escalating towards the crash. Apparently I wasn’t mistaken about that vibe. It was the height of the economic boom and having been away I could especially feel the electricity of people in money frenzy. As a temporary outsider, I was probably seeing more than if I was right in the middle of it.”

Peter Kuper grew up in Cleveland, Ohio in the ‘60s and ‘70s. His life is seen through the eyes of his comics avatar Walter Kurtz, in his autobiography Stop Forgetting to Remember. While Kurtz is an obvious cipher of Kuper, the artist’s intent at using a thinly veiled alter ego has more to do with his philosophy towards this particular life story.

“I thought that was the honest approach,” Peter says of Kurtz’s pinch-hitting for him in his life story. “What I'd done was move the pieces of my life around a bit, and not worry about sticking with a straight-up story. It was interesting to me as a story. My experiences in many ways are universal experiences, so it wasn't as important that it was 'my story'.

“However, having said that, much to my surprise, I got a lot of people saying 'Is it really you?' – I thought I was being obvious it was.”

Kurtz/Kuper face several universal dilemmas in their shared life: difficulty at losing his virginity during the awkward teenage years in Cleveland, experimenting with drugs, dealing with psychotic ex-girlfriends and coping with the Earth-shattering break-up of that “love/hate relationship” that inevitably follows, and even the combination anticipation and dread that comes with fatherhood. Kurtz narrates the memories in a combination of reminiscence smattered with self-criticism: sometimes he sees himself as a wormboy or a scared rabbit.


“There's a French edition coming out now, and I made myself 'Peter Kuper' again through the whole book dropping the pseudonym,” Peter says. “Perhaps it was an error on my part, in the assumption that it would be so obvious that this was my autobiography. Apparently people prefer to be lied to. I should have learned that from the George W. Bush years! Making myself a character freed me up to do other things, like have the whole book be about my character trying to finish this one graphic novel. In truth I did ten books in that same time period, but I thought reducing it to the one, made for a better story. That’s the last time I’ll be honest!”

But back to Peter Kuper, the cartoonist and illustrator: He escaped the confines of Cleveland for New York City in 1977, with the promise of a job in animation. When that didn’t pan out, he became an inker for Harvey Comics’ Richie Rich comic book while going to school; it was the first step towards him becoming a cartoonist, one that was followed by assisting cartoonist Howard Chaykin in 1978.

“I came to New York with very little technical ability,” Peter admits. “I barely drew, but I was really interested in comics and had been a real big fan of the medium. I met Howard when I was twelve, at a comic convention, and he was a nineteen year-old fan artist. He got into the field, and every year I'd cross paths with him at the New York comic convention. When I moved to New York and bumped into him again, he happened to need an assistant and gave me a shot. I needed to get my technical chops together and working for Chaykin at Upstart Studio was a pressure-cooker chance to do that.”

At the time, Chaykin was a rising star in his own right, having recently drawn the Star Wars adaptation for Marvel Comics, as well as building an impressive body of work that ranged from comics to illustration. It turned out to be a two and a half year stint for the young Peter Kuper.

“I was in art school at the same time, so I'd go to art school during the day, then run over to the studio, and work evenings and on the weekends. In that studio were also Walter Simonson, Jim Starlin was there, Val Mayerik, James Sherman and Frank Miller came in when he was starting on Daredevil – I got to see working artists, and Howard was a super workaholic, so I learned that when I got out of school, it wasn't like 'now I can relax.' I discovered that working for myself meant working at a higher velocity than school. That was really great, because there were no surprises in terms of what being a working cartoonist was about. It was an important learning experience.”

While learning the craft and discipline of comics at Upstart, Kuper formed his own tastes outside of the studio. The facts that Upstart was experimenting within the form of superhero comics and that Chaykin was, according to Kuper, “always doing something in the mainstream that was, relatively speaking, alternative” probably made it easier for the budding artist to transition to underground comics.


“My interests were shifting around the middle of my being there,” Peter says. “I had been into superheroes in my teens, but had grown tired of them. I was nonetheless reading all the comics everyone in the studio were doing, and that was having some impact. Towards the end of art school though, I discovered a whole new set of artists that interested me, particularly Saul Steinberg, German Expressionism, Ralph Steadman - and rejected most of the styles I had grown up reading in mainstream comics. Already for a long time the underground comics, especially Crumb, had been what appealed to me any way, both stylistically and in their subject matter.

“Though working at Upstart I was immersed in the mainstream field, I was moving away from those kinds of comics. I was starting to get illustration work even when I was in art school. Fortunately at the end of school I started working for the New York Times, and that was not the type of work anybody in the Upstart studio was doing. I started doing linoleum prints and collage, working in forms that weren't anything like mainstream comics. Even as I rejected superheroes as something I might want to draw I still enjoyed many aspects of what Chaykin, Simonson and Frank Miller were doing with the form.

“But the muscle-bound superhero style I moved away from completely and nothing I aspired to do. It was clear to me that I wouldn't be doing anything new by regurgitating my superhero sources. Even though Jack Kirby is still an influence on my work, and I still get charged up looking at his work, I don't want to do those kinds of comics.”

The artist that emerged from a stint at Upstart and four years at Pratt Institute was an underground cartoonist who employed thick lines and even linoleum block prints for his illustrations. Peter was also gaining freelance illustration gigs with mainstream publications, a more prestigious field than superhero comics.

“I grew up reading thousands of super hero comics and I was looking for the next step, and underground comics were that, and then I wanted influences outside of comics. I'm still exploring, if for no other reason than out of boredom. The water's rising I want to jump to the next higher rock. If I stand in one place too long I get bored and need something new to refresh me.”


Around the time of his leaving Upstart, Peter Kuper and his partner Seth Tobocman founded World War 3 Illustrated, their vehicle for underground political cartoons and commentary. WW3 is gearing up for its thirtieth anniversary in 2010.

“It's a mini-miracle—our secret may be the punk aesthetic of anti-success,” Peter reflects. “Not that that was a goal! But we were always interested in keeping it going more than worrying about it becoming a huge money making enterprise. It turns out that if you do too well with a cooperative, there are issues of money and who's doing better than whom. Since no one is getting paid, and it all comes out of pocket, being editor just means you do extra heavy lifting and more bottle washing, and that has kept a pretty even keel. If you can get something out of it, it is the magazine itself, and being involved with it is a great association. I'm really proud to have the long-term connection to something like that that people have come to know around the world.”

According to the World War 3 website, the titled war in question refers to “the ongoing wars our so-called leaders have been waging all our lives around the world and on our very own doorsteps. WW3 also illuminates the war we wage on each other and sometimes the one taking place in our own brains.” Since its inception, World War 3 has survived four Presidents (three Republican, one Democrat), the so-called end of the Cold War, and the emergence on the “War on Terror”. A look at the magazine’s complete run is a document of the social-political environment and the shaping of American and world history. After all this change, it remains a relatively unchanged magazine, though:

“The magazine has gotten some color, and the paper quality has gone up a bit, and there has been some design tweaking,” Peter states. “When we've made more money, we've always put it straight into having a better production. From the editing stand point, these days I can send out a call to people from a complete range to students to as big as you can get in illustration and comics, and get them to contribute. That's really nice and an opportunity to publish artists whose work I love.


“There's a lot about the process that remains the same, and we haven't altered the process dramatically over the years. Maybe the biggest thing is that we don't have huge meetings for each issue, as we once did. We work via the Internet, e-mailing ideas back and forth which makes it slot into my life between other things more easily. We figured out how to break down the responsibilities and share them so we don't get burnt out. If too much work falls on too few people it is easy to burn out on a long-term project like this.”

The most impressive aspect of World War 3 is the fact that Kuper, Tobocman, and staff have all kept it honest: it is, in the strictest sense, a not for profit publication that has managed to stay around through the decline of the magazine. Due to its longevity, WW3 is beginning to profit from its ability to influence the younger up-and-coming generation.

“It's really interesting because there are people who grew up reading it. The last issue had an editor Kevin Pyle, who's a fantastic cartoonist; he grew up in Kansas and came across a copy there. He said it was like a call from New York, and a lifeline and was one of the reasons he moved to the city.

“It’s part of what we're trying to do, we're trying to send out this message in a bottle that connects people and gives them a sense that there is a vast group of people who share these sentiments of concern about what is going on in the world.

“For many of the people involved in this magazine, World War 3 was their first opportunity to get published and start in the field, and get some feedback from other artists. World War 3 helped launch many of our careers.”

Almost thirty years from that first issue rolling off the presses, Peter has gained a perspective on his place in the grand scheme of comics:

“When I started in comics I thought what a rip-off it was that there was the Beat Generation, the hippie movement with the Underground Comix scene, but they were gone by the time my generation showed up. I’m finding in retrospect that what we’ve done with World War 3 was to create a group like that of our own. As an artist, you're mostly isolated and World War 3 was a way of breaking through some of that isolation, so that even before the piece went to print, you had other artists giving feedback on your work.”

“I'm pretty lucky because a lot of the illustration jobs I did were really close to my heart, as far as the subject matter goes,” Peter observes later in our interview. “I directed my work that way and I got known for doing that kind of political subject matter, and those were the calls I'd get. It was fantastic, doing work on topics I could sink my teeth into.

“I removed the part where I compartmentalized my art. Before I would work in (the magazine I co-founded) World War 3 Illustrated, doing political comics I that was separate from my illustration work. After some years I managed to push those worlds together, both stylistically with stencil comics and content wise with by only taking jobs that were on political subjects. The illustrations I did in magazines and newspapers like the New York Times were dealing with political topics that could sit in World War 3.”


Peter Kuper isn’t just a traditional pen-and-ink cartoonist: he’s a mixed-media maniac, often passing up traditional pen and ink for illustrative techniques that involve everything from scratchboard to linoleum prints to spray-painted stencils.

“It was a leap from doing them as illustrations,” Peter says of the stencils. “My life long pal, Seth Tobocman turned me on them. I was looking at an illustration he did this way and it rang my bell. It was apparently a very loud bell, because that was in 1988 and here, to this day, I’m still doing stencils. At this point, I feel like I want to move away from spray paint because of its toxic nature. The irony of doing pieces on degrading environment using aerosol sprays is too much.”
A cardboard box is set out of a window in his studio, cans of spray paint and paper stencils laying within. Kuper’s process involves a pencil drawing, cutting a very fine stencil out of a Xerox, and then a little mastery with cans of spray paint.

“I spray them with enamel spray paint, not an airbrush, so I can pick up one can, put it down, and then spray another fast,” he says.

“I do it a page at a time. I usually spray a base in red and black. I spray the red paint first and then spray the black on top of it which gives a glow of the red under the black. Occasionally I do more than one stencil per piece, but not that often. I'm experimenting now with rolling or brushing on acrylic paint with a stencil. I want to move towards painting a little more, and bring new things into my work.”

Kuper applied his stencil approach to an adaptation of Upton Sinclair’s seminal novel The Jungle, which was a look at the inhumane working conditions of Chicago’s meatpacking plants. The grime of the factories come to life through spattered black paint, giving the artwork an imposing and claustrophobic vibe. According to Peter in his art book Speechless:

The company, First Publishing, was shortly driven to bankruptcy by mismanagement, and I had to retain a lawyer to be paid my page rate. I never received any royalties, and The Jungle, a tale of worker’s oppression, became the last book the company ever published.


Peter next applied his stencil style to the iconic Spy vs. Spy. Started by a Cuban refugee, Antonio Prohias in 1961, the strip follows a black and white spy killing one another through unlikely and ingenious ways. Imagine Rube Goldberg machines in the hands of the world super powers’ top agents, mixed in with Looney Tunes slapstick.

“I did it in stencils when they asked me to try out for the job figuring they wouldn’t go for it,” Kuper says of the 1996 try-out. “I didn’t want to try to mimic the style of Prohias’, I thought that ‘If I’m going to do this, I’ll do something that’s different. I thought they’d thank me for my kooky approach, bid me adieu and I’d go on my merry way.’ When they said, ‘You got the job’, I thought I’d probably just do it for a year. I’m in my thirteenth year of Spy vs. Spy.”


He went starker in 2003 with yet another adaptation, this one of Franz Kafka’s classic short story The Metamorphosis. Through use of scratchboard and vertigo-inducing panel shapes and sizes, The Metamorphosis catches the dark and foreboding aspects of the story in sequential form.

The impressive facet of Kuper’s work is that, despite the numerous approaches, it is still distinctly his, whether it’s a stenciled or lino-cut comic, or an old window pane with paintings on each sheet of aged glass.

“With my career, I went from doing line drawings to lino prints to scratchboard to using the stencil approach, and back to pen and ink.,” Kuper observes. “I was doing collage in my sketchbook while travelling around on my other trips in Africa and Southeast Asia, like gluing down maps and that got integrated into my illustration work.

“I wasn't trying to create a style; it was an organic process. The beauty of working in a sketchbook is never thinking about style. If it comes out being a style where people then say 'I recognize your work'. That, to me, is fine, but it has to be organic. That I can work in any medium, but because of my sensibilities, it's going to come out looking like something I did is nice. If I'm painting, stenciling, or carving wood, I hope all has the feel of being part of a whole.”


At the end of the day, though, Peter Kuper is still readjusting to life back in New York City, sorting through the experience in Oaxaca and the artistic freedom found between two covers of a well-worn sketchbook:

“Part of the digesting from Mexico is having spent all this time drawing in my sketchbook, I want to transfer some of what I've been doing there into my work. I think the next comic I do will be pen and ink with watercolor, which is something more akin to my sketchbooks. As far as illustrations go, I haven't really looked for illustration work since I've gotten back. I was propelled by what was going on in the Bush administration to draw about the subject matter, but now there are fewer outlets for political art. And, I'm just a little bit burnt out on the subject matter. I have drawers filled with stencil art on that history, and I'm now interested in what other kind of work I can do, not devoid of politics, but something I might want to have on my wall. Just staring at the problems and horrors of the world can get pretty depressing to look at!”
Armed with his new influences, he still takes time to look back at his older ones, in the form of comic strip pioneers of the early 20th century.

“There are so many other comics that I do return to,” Kuper points out. “I'm continuously rediscovering how much I love early turn-of-the-century strips, like Windsor McCay's work and Lyonel Feininger. There's so much information in their work I want that influence to wash over me as often as possible.

“Thanks to my time in Mexico I’ve gotten a new infusion of artistic influences, from looking at Diego Rivera, and other muralists. Though I wasn't intending to copy them stylistically my sketchbook pages became more and more like murals with a cross section of different images built up to form a single spread. I think that is very much a result of the environment. The simultaneity you find there of past and present history.”

However Peter Kuper may reinvent himself, and whatever extra approaches he adapts in the near future, he keeps sight of his intentions as an independent cartoonist.


“Throughout my career I’ve tried to defy what people—especially non-comic readers, presumed about the form,” Peter says. “By removing things like word balloons and panel borders, or doing comics in stencils, I hoped that people would discover that their presumptions were wrong. This seemed to work especially with wordless comics like The System and Eye of the Beholder (that was the first regular strip to appear in The New York Times ran in alternative papers for ten years) and also happily landed me the Spy vs. Spy gig.

“I’m also interested in exploring comics as a language. I like the idea that I can go to other countries hand them a wordless book and say 'There you go, my Russian friend, enjoy!'
“In general, there are so many aspects to comics that I'm interested in exploring…I just keep on finding new areas and going 'That'd be cool, I want to try that.' As a medium, it's so wide open that there’ll never be enough time for me to explore all the things that are possible, but I’ll die trying!”

See more of Peter Kuper's work at his official site.

For the Love of Comics #4: Spider-Man in the Rye


Art by Jack Kirby (left); Willie Jimenez (right)

Words: Christopher Irving

While Holden Caulfield from Catcher in the Rye and Peter Parker/Spider-Man from his first appearance in Amazing Fantasy #15 are from contrasting genres and modes of storytelling, they both come of age through the grieving process.
Holden, the protagonist of Catcher, is a prep school misfit who is expelled for poor classroom performance. At the opening of the novel, he is standing alone on Thomsen Hill, feeling dejected since he disappointed the fencing team by forgetting their gear on a New York subway car. By standing apart from the student body, Holden's role as social misfit and loner is brought out from the outset of the novel.


Holden goes to meet up with his elderly professor, Mr. Spencer, who proceeds to berate Holden for his poor performance at Pencey Prep. The example of poor classwork that Spencer presents as testimony to Holden's ineptitude is an essay on mummification in Ancient Egypt, an example Spencer flunked Holden over. Author J.D. Salinger introduces us to Holden's symptoms within the first two chapters, and reveals the source of Holden's pathos by page 38, when Holden describes his brother Allie's baseball mitt:
[Allie]'s dead now. He got leukemia and died when we were up in Maine on July 18, 1946. You'd have liked him. He was two years younger than I was, but he was about fifty times as intelligent...

Holden not only has difficulties in living up to the example his younger brother had set, but suffers from "survivor's guilt" in losing Allie, perhaps in not treating his kid brother the way he wishes he had when he was alive. Throughout Catcher in the Rye, Holden struggles with his own sense of mortality and vulnerability, all something he denied acknowledging since Allie's death.

Out of sheer frustration, Holden decides to run away from school to go to the city, which is where, being faced with death on a few occasions, he will finally acknowledge his mortality and come to grips with Allie's death. As a defense mechanism, he often jokes about death, or refers to it in a figurative manner (there are several examples of Holden referring to something as "killing" him). The first instance of his light-heartedness towards death occurs on the train leaving Pencey. He is seated next to the mother of a classmate and he tells he will soon have a "brain tumor" removed.

After sending a prostitute out of his hotel room in New York, Holden starts talking to Allie; "I do that sometimes, when I get very depressed." What he tells "Allie" is to "get his bike and meet me..," which is Holden's attempt to correct an instance he shut his younger brother out. This is a sign of guilt on Holden's behalf and his attempt to fix something he still blames himself over. Shortly after, Holden is beaten by a pimp, and experiences his first brush with his own mortality. Afterwards, he says "I thought I was dying” and, before truly acknowledging his brush with death, pretends he is a movie character with a bullet in his gut.

When Holden encounters a couple of nuns, he discusses the play Romeo and Juliet with them, claiming his favorite character as Mercutio. "I liked him the best in the play, old Mercutio...He was very smart and entertaining and all." Mercutio, the comic relief of the play, is caught between the Capulet and Montague war and killed. It seems Holden identifies with Mercutio and, perhaps feeling guilty over Allie's death, wishes himself dead as well. However, due to his immaturity, Holden (like Mercutio) uses humor as a defense mechanism to keep from acknowledging that vulnerability.

His next brush with mortality comes when a drunken Holden stumbles into Central Park and develops chunks of ice on his wet hair. "I thought I'd probably get pneumonia and die." Holden begins to worry about his own funeral before recalling how at Allie's funeral "All the visitors could get in their cars and turn on their radios and all and then go someplace nice for dinner - everybody except Allie.” It is clear that Holden’s guilt goes down to the level of the funeral goers; he views them as embarrassing houseguests whom he has brought along to an important person’s house, and takes the responsibility on his own shoulders.
Holden’s guilt seems just one thing that he has repressed: he recalls the death of Castle, a fellow student at his old prep school of Elkton Hills. Castle was beaten by other students for calling another one conceited and refusing to take the comment back. In order to escape the torture and beating, Castle jumped out of a window, and to his death. Holden’s only connection to Castle was in loaning Castle his sweater as a favor, the same sweater Castle was wearing when he died. Holden must have looked at Castle as the way he should have been when Maurice the pimp beat him in his hotel room: defiant and willing to die for that defiance.

The moment where Holden finally acknowledges his mortality is in the museum. After bringing two boys to the mummy exhibit, Holden comes to peace with the general idea of death: “I was the only one left in the tomb then. I sort of liked it, in a way. It was nice and peaceful.” Then, Holden realizes that peace can not be found anywhere, when he finds “Fuck You” written in graffiti on the tomb wall. “You can’t ever find a place that’s nice and peaceful, because there isn’t any.” He left Pencey Prep with an unconscious deathwish, thinking death the only escape into peace; it took something as simple as a scrawled profanity to realize that ultimate peace is unobtainable in life or death. When he passes out in the men’s room, having nearly “killed” himself, he awakes feeling better and more alive than (perhaps) he has the entire book.
When Holden meets up with his sister Phoebe and decides to return home rather than run away, he not only decides to choose life (as unpeaceful as it may be), he allows her to be his Catcher in the Rye, preventing him from hurtling off the cliff to his death. Holden has come of age and realized that he must accept life, no matter what knocks it renders to him.

Where Holden Caulfield is an antihero of 20th century American literature, Peter Parker/Spider-Man is the first antihero of superhero comic books. Much like Holden Caulfield, Peter Parker tries to escape his flawed life, and makes a fateful decision when faced with mortality.
From the first page of Amazing Fantasy #15 by writer Stan Lee and artist Steve Ditko, Peter Parker is shown standing aloof from a group of fellow teenagers at his high school (much like Holden alone on the hill). “Peter Parker? He’s Midtown High’s only professional wallflower!” a girl in the group states, while one student points and another dismisses the forlorn Parker with a wave of his hand. Unlike Holden, though, Parker has a support system at home in his elderly Aunt May and Uncle Ben. Ironically, his old-fashioned upbringing makes him unable to relate to others his age.

Peter is also a teenage outcast; the only difference is that Parker sincerely tries to fit in, but can’t seem to fit in with his interests in science. When he invites peers to go to a science hall exhibit, they turn him down with a flippant “You stick to science, son! We’ll take the chicks!” and turn their backs on him. At the science hall, a spider interrupts an experiment and “the dying insect, in sudden shock, bites the nearest living thing, at the split second before life ebbs from its radioactive body!” That nearest living thing is Peter Parker, who suddenly feels woozy from the bite by the burning and glowing spider.
Nearly hit by a passing car on his walk home, Peter’s instinctive jump becomes a spider-like leap onto the side of a building, and he scales the wall with his new power. Peter’s brush with the mortality of the spider, and with the near-miss with the car, ironically results in his finding his new life. Peter decides to test his new powers by competing against a wrestler for reward money, disguising himself to avoid embarrassment if he fails.

Peter wins the money after defeating the wrestler with his spider powers, and embarks upon a career as a masked showman, the Amazing Spider-Man. Wearing a black and red costume with a web design, spider-goggles, and a pair of “web-shooters” which shoot lines of “liquid cement” like a spider’s web, Peter makes the rounds on variety shows. The entire time, Peter has kept his Spider-Man identity secret from his loving aunt and uncle.
One night, after a show, Spider-Man fails to stop a thief from escaping a security guard. When the guard berates him, he comes back with “Sorry, pal! That’s YOUR job! I’m THRU being pushed around—by anyone! From now on I just look out for number one—that means—ME!” Peter continues his show career as Spider-Man until, on fateful night, he comes home to a police car parked in front of his house. A policeman notifies Peter of his Uncle Ben’s death, shot by a burglar the police have trapped in “the old Acme warehouse at the waterfront!” Angered, Peter runs to his room, changing into his Spider-Man costume. “A killer could hold off an army in that gloomy, old place!...But he won’t hold off—SPIDER-MAN!”

Determined to avenge Uncle Ben, Spider-Man swings across town to the dark and abandoned warehouse and defeats the burglar. When Spider-Man holds the burglar into the light, he sees his face and makes a horrid realization: “It’s the fugitive who ran past me! The one I didn’t stop when I had the chance!” Leaving the burglar tied up for the police, Spider-Man retreats to where he can remove his mask. “My fault—all my fault! If only I had stopped him when I COULD have! But I DIDN’T—and now—Uncle Ben—is dead...”
Walking down the dark streets, alone and dejected, Peter Parker is “aware at last that in this world, with great power there must also come—great responsibility!”

The death of Holden’s brother sent Holden on a suicide course, where he grew apathetic at everything from guilt, and culminated in a life-threatening pilgrimage to New York. Holden’s final acknowledgement of mortality’s severity (and, in return, his vulnerability) was in his finally deciding to live.
Peter Parker’s brush with mortality allowed him to live on a social level; when he forsook his social responsibility as a citizen with the ability to make a difference, he lost the absolute peace provided him by his Uncle Ben. Peter’s existence became more tortured after his acknowledgement of mortality, where Holden’s existence became more peaceful after his.
In the end, the Holden Caulfield walked away with his kid sister, while the well-meaning Peter Parker walked away alone.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Dig Comics with Graphic NYC and Hanley's

This Saturday at 3:00, Christopher will be part of a panel following a screening of the comics documentary Dig Comics, about filmmaker Miguel Cima's crusade to get more people to read our favorite storytelling medium:

San Diego Comic Con's Best Documentary of 2009 DIG COMICS will screen with filmmaker Miguel Cima moderating a panel of industry professionals including Danny Fingeroth, Tom Brevoort, Andy Helfer and Christopher Irving! The film explores why the great American art form of comic books has lost so many readers since their hayday in the 1940's - and what we can do to turn that around! Not just a film, but the start of a movement! Feature film backed by Edward James Olmos is in the works. Come and join us at ground zero of our grass roots effort to get America to once again DIG COMICS!

Jim Hanley's Universe is located at 4 West 33rd Street in Manhattan, across from the Empire State Building.

See you there!

Odds and Gems # 3: James Kochalka and Magic Boy and the Word of God



Words: Gene Kogan

Man, I love that James Kochalka. I mindlessly pick up whatever he releases. I’m a Kochalka Zombie. Which is not easy, considering he’s more prolific than Marvel. From his children’s books to his autobiographical work to his spoofs and his books that connote a certain social commentary, I gobble it all up like different flavors of Jelly Belly’s. And like the addictive jelly beans, his work is curious, colorful, delightful and leaves you wanting more. I’ve always wondered why I’m so enamored with his work. It’s simplistic, childish, cutesy and over the top. But somehow he makes it all work. And not just work, but work brilliantly. Yes, you read that right. James Kochalka is brilliant. And I DO NOT throw that maddeningly overused word around freely. Everything I’ve read from him just hits the spot.

Well, almost everything.



Fairly early in his career, he self published a comic book called Magic Boy and the Word of God. It lists 1996 as the publication date, so it would rank among his earliest published comic books, proceeded only by a couple of comics he did through Slave Labor. I can only speculate as to why Slave Labor didn’t publish this comic. Perhaps Kochalka wanted to publish it himself. But my guess is that it was just a tad too weird for them. It’s an odd comic. Even by Kochalka’s standard.

I purchased this comic at the Alternative Press Expo back in 1998 in San Jose. It was the first time I had traveled for any convention and I was mesmerized the entire trip. I was dazed, and most definitely confused. I must have stopped at every table and purchased something at each one. I don’t know how I got everything home. I don’t even remember how I got myself home. It was one of those weekends. I recall James Kochalka’s name floating around the alternative press of the day. I was aware he made a mini comic called James Kochalka Superstar. But I’d never actually seen his work when I approached his table. I purchased Magic Boy and the Word of God and he was kind enough to put a great little sketch on the cover, which, oddly enough, featured a photo of him in lieu of art. I found this amusing. Upon my return I was so overwhelmed by the sheer volume of my booty, I ended up putting it all away in a large box while I recuperated from the trip. It took me years to actually go through this box and the treasures that lay within (which is probably how long it took me to properly recover from the experience). So I didn’t end up reading this comic until well after my reverence for Mr. Kochalka was firmly set. A good thing, since I doubt reading it would have inspired me to give his other work much of a chance. A very odd comic, indeed.

Before I rip into this comic, a little recap of my love for all things Kochalka is in order.

The first thing I ever read by Kochalka was Monkey Vs. Robot. A mostly wordless graphic novel detailing the clash between a community of monkeys, primitive, self-sufficient and blissful in their ways, and self-reproducing robots whose agenda is simply progress. The drawing style and the subjects featured suggest the story would be geared toward children. But I discovered, repeatedly reinforced by almost his entire catalogue, that nothing could be further from the truth. While I can see how an older child can enjoy this story on the surface, there is a level of sophistication that would ultimately be lost on them. Sure, at its essence, this is a simple story of nature versus progress, but it’s a layered story both visually and thematically. It comments on the origins of war. It cleverly explores human activities without incorporating any humans, by featuring pre and post human evolutionary figures in the form of monkeys and robots. Visually, the compositions call to mind animation, as it cinematically utilizes parallel juxtaposition in exploring the worlds of the monkeys and the robots and how they collide. The inevitable battles are brutal and violent. Reading this book was an eye opening experience. I was genuinely surprised how drawn into the story I was. It was a quick read, but left a profound, lingering effect on me. I found myself referencing it mentally and it started spilling into my conversation.

At that point, whenever I would see another Kochalka book, I was compelled to buy it. And there was certainly no shortage of Kochalka material over the years: Fantastic Butterflies, Kissers, Peanutbutter & Jeremy, Cute Manifesto, Fancy Froglin (got the t-shirt too), Pinky & Stinky, Tiny Bubbles, Quit Your Job, Johnny Boo, Superf*ckers and many, many more. All of which I genuinely enjoyed in varying degrees, some of which I absolutely loved.

Then I hit upon the Sketchbook Diaries and the subsequent collections titled American Elf.

What can I say about American Elf that hasn’t already been said? It’s unique. If there was nothing else to recommend this book, this would be sufficient. It’s unique in the way Cerebus is unique, in the way Krazy Kat is unique, the way Chris Ware and Robert Crumb are unique. Simply put, there is nothing else like it and never will be. An ongoing daily diary strip that he’s been producing since 1998, touching on one moment in the day, from the singular to the bizarrely irrelevant to the heart-breakingly poignant. But unique is a throwaway description which is no way does this extraordinary work justice. It’s wonderful in so many ways. His childlike characters - light hearted, playful, whimsical versions of himself and his family - are sheer joy to observe: the situations which make him happy, those which infuriate him, the humor of his lovely wife, the birth and growth of his 2 boys, the development of his career, etc. Reading this seminal work helps me appreciate the fantastic in the little moments that make up my life, with my own family. Watching him succeed and fail, anger and rejoice, delight and revolt, sometimes justifiably, something ridiculously, one would have to be alien not to relate. And the whole time being so damn cute. American Elf is as courageous as it is delightful. It’s easily one of my favorite comics on the planet.

But Magic Boy and the Word of God? Not so much. Did I mention it’s an odd comic? Well, it is. I’m going to pretty much lay out the entire story for you, and this is going to be fun. So if you plan on getting your hands on one of these bad boys, I suggest you stop reading. For the rest of you, let’s dive in.


**SPOILER WARNING**

Magic Boy, an elf (what else?), has a crush on his classmate, Spandy, but doesn’t know how to approach her. We also learn that the devil is a cat like creature who is obsessed with a little flower growing in hell, but slowly dying. Magic Boy and the devil meet when they stumble upon the same six-pack of beer, which they decide to share, along with their respective sorrows. The devil encourages Magic Boy to invite Spandy to party with them. But not before he encourages him to throw a can at a passing squirrel, killing it. Moving on, Spandy agrees to party with the two and they proceed to drink vodka, lick frogs and go skinny dipping. When Spandy gets wasted and passes out, the devil steals her soul and takes it back to hell to inject into his flower so that it may live. In the meantime, the squirrel Magic Boy killed goes to heaven and meets God, who decides that it’s not her time yet and sends her “pure soul” back to earth in the form of a sword, which lands besides the distraught Magic Boy. He proceeds to stick it in his gut and finds himself in hell. There he locates the devil, jumps him and forces him to reveal what he did with Spandy’s soul. Magic Boy falls in love with the flower infused with Spandy’s soul and brings it back with him to Earth. He then attempts to mate with the flower (um…yeah) through some scientific experiment (yes, it appears he’s also a scientist). In the meantime, we learn that Magic Boy created an ultra genius robot elf, who he forces to work at the Chinese Restaurant instead of him, so that he can have time to work on his experiments. The robot is resentful and feels that he’s too intelligent to work in a Chinese Restaurant and thinks Magic Boy is an idiot. Back at home, while the experiment is brewing, Magic Boy decides to read to the flower from the bible (WTF?!). He falls asleep and is awoken by the robot returning home after a long day at work. The robot is furious to discover that while he was working his ass off, Magic Boy was sleeping. But Magic Boy has worse problems. He forgets about his experiment, which catches fire and engulfs the entire house. Amidst the smoke, Magic Boy finds the devil has returned seeking revenge. While the house burns, the robot rescues the flower and escapes. Turns out, the robot is also in love with the flower (of course). A sudden explosion sends Magic Boy flying from the house and smack into the robot, who then drops the plant, breaking her pot. From the pot emerges a weird hybrid flower child. The robot is devastated over Magic Boys successful mating with the flower and kicks the flower calling her a slut, among other things. The flower child escapes the rampaging robot. A few days later, a naked and charred Magic Boy emerges from the fire alive. The squirrel (who is no longer a sword) tells him that all the evil has been burned out of him. But Magic Boy is pissed and tells the squirrel, God and the Devil (who is back and now wants to party) that he was done with all of them and to take a hike. The story ends with Magic Boy wondering if he had done the right thing. The epilogue shows the flower child grieving over the body of his dead flower mother. That’s the story, folks.

**END OF SPOILER WARNER**

The comic is beyond absurd. And surreal. It has no rhyme nor reason. It seems almost free associated. And maybe it was. Perhaps it was an experiment in how the creative mind wonders. No question a worthy endeavor. But not every experiment is successful. In the end, you still have to judge a comic by its content. The story is silly, lacks focus and is utterly dissociated. When I finished, I was left scratching my head and wondering at the potency of the drugs Mr. Kochalka was obtaining.

Still, unlike other comics I’ve read and didn’t care for, I held on to this one. There is something quite endearing about this comic, something special. For starters, the cover is awesome. I can’t remember another comic, new or old, that featured a photo of the creator. How egomaniacal, how self-centered, how genius. James Kochalka superstar indeed. Even early on he was already shattering the mold. And the story, as crazy as it was, had hints of the James Kochalka I know and love. You recognize characters from his other works. Spandy is actually the name of his cat, as seen in American Elf, who must have also been an influence on his rendering of the devil. Robot Elf is a recurring concept and was actually a character in one of his earlier Slave Labor comics, the much better and more focused Magic Boy & the Robot Elf. We know, from American Elf, that James worked at a Chinese Restaurant for many years, before leaving to concentrate on cartooning full time. We also get a very clear sense that his relationship with Spandy (the girl in the story, not the cat in real life) is based on his wife Amy, who we know from many of his works, perhaps in the beginning stages of their courtship. These unapologetic references to his real world give this comic an earnestness, an awkward dedication, even if it is all over the place. It’s like a high school poem, it’s bad, but kind of sweet at the same time.

This story also utilizes one of my favorite Kochalka institutions, which you find in almost all his work other than his children’s books: he employs a childlike sensibility, when his stories are most definitely not for children. They feature nudity, vulgarity and mostly adult themes, only with cute storybook characters and surroundings. And of course, there is that unmistakable element of Kochalka’s personality emanating from the story.

To this day, when I think of Kochalka, I think of this comic as much as American Elf or Monkey Vs Robot. It’s a testament to his talent and appeal that even my least favorite work can hold such a special place in my heart.

In a way, this work is as courageous as American Elf, considering how early in his career he produced this comic. Right from the start, he broke conventions and played by his own rules in producing his stories. A rebel, albeit without a clue. He didn’t try to emulate the artists he grew up with. I mean, sure he was influenced by such alternative luminaries as Daniel Clowes and Peter Bagge. But there is no one you can point to and say “that Kochalka, look at him ripping off so and so again.” He had no peers. And still doesn’t. He’s sort of like the buttered popcorn Jelly Belly.

Man, I love that James Kochalka.

Gene Kogan first wrote for Yellow Rat Bastard magazine (published by the hipster store chain of the same name), and covered luminaries including Peter Kuper, Tony Millionaire and Bill Plympton. Shortly after, he followed it up with online column Back Issue Reviews. He lives in Brooklyn with his wife, Liz, their son, Shaylem, their dog Mabel Eddie Campbell Kogan and way more stuff than is probably legally allowed in an apartment.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

A review of our King Con panel

From John Abrams on mapcidy.com

Graphic NYC is a new internet project from interviewer Christopher Irving and photographer Seth Kushner that is meant to profile and promote New York as the center of the cartooning world, and in Irving’s words, “to make cartoonists look like rock stars.” What an awesome idea. In a world of reality TV stars famous for absolutely nothing, here’s an effort to shine the light on some people of obvious and remarkable talent. The website currently features luminaries such as current Marvel editor-in-chief Joe Quesada, pioneering Batman artist Jerry Robinson, and underground megastar Dean Haspiel (more on him in a minute), and Saturday’s panel featured four artists: Peter Kuper, Christine Norrie, Becky Cloonan, and George O’Connor. I hadn’t heard of any of them beforehand except for Kuper, and from what I saw of their artwork, I am excited to seek out more. This was an unexpectedly thrilling and inspiring discovery.

Read the full post Here.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Graphically Speaking: Johnny Ryan's Prison Pit - You can smell it from here



Words: Jared Gniewek

In Lynda Barry’s amazing book,
What It Is, she writes about the creative impulse of youth. She reminds us that there was a time when almost all of us drew pictures and how most of us at some point give it up as it left “too much evidence”. She writes about the “good kind” of drawings that people like to see… the houses, families, dogs, flowers. Then she talks about the “bad kind”. These are the kinds of pictures that get you into trouble. The ones the grown ups don’t want to see. The naked ladies, the violence, the just plain strange.

Johnny Ryan draws the bad pictures. Unapologetically and lots of ‘em and I hope to god he never stops. He has consistently put out pure and uncensored strips, cartoons, and books that defy every politically correct bone in your body. Drawings that cock-slap America.

His new book is out. It’s called Prison Pit and it kinda’ sorta’ kicks serious ass.

It’s not his funniest work, but if you’re familiar with his comics, you know that’s pretty much impossible. Everyone who loves Johnny Ryan has a favorite gag and once that gag becomes their favorite then they kind of own it.

They drunkenly and failingly try to describe the comic to friends and end up sounding like a monster (laymen trying to tell a Johnny Ryan joke is like Michael Richards trying to channel Sarah Silverman --and we all remember how that ended up).

The joke becomes a part of them. They will be doing something completely unrelated and it will pop into their head and cause spurts of spastic laughter.

When on hallucinogens they will see the gag floating before their eyes with trails and neon rainbows beckoning them to join it in a magical place.

They will find themselves unable to make love to their significant others as the social and physical reality of the just plain ugliness and retardedness of sex keeps them from enjoying it with a partner. Vomiting becomes more sexual to these poor souls.

They fall into despair and become fueled only by the joke that put them in the state in the first place and writhe and twist as masturbatory creatures sobbing softly to themselves in darkness, consumed for all time.

So if you’ve never read him, one of the bits in Prison Pit could very well become your personal Johnny Ryan joke. In a way I envy you because there is a sophistication to the book that he hasn’t had a chance to achieve before. It reads as a satire of the very idea of the intellectual graphic novel through a subversion of the tone and rhythms.

The way he uses light to dark transitions and long meditative silences as the prisoner/protagonist stumbles about the alien landscape reminded me of many of the graphic novels I’ve read in recent years. I kept thinking of Chester Brown’s Louis Riel in the way that the energy of the landscape was reflected in the drawings.

The design of the book has the veneer of a fancy modern graphic novel (or a nineteen thirties proto-graphic novel) as it is broken up into a mainly four panel grid and has the size of many of these types of books.

The cover, with a blood drenched warrior holding the decapitated head of his foe, mouth frothing postmortem, is almost a proclamation to take your intellectual fare and stuff it!
The cover lettering is garish and electric. Much of Johnny Ryan’s work reminds me of the types of doodles barely literate head bangers used to scratch into the detention desks in my younger days. Ryan has taken that aesthetic and refined it. I could see the lettering choice for the cover being used by a really shitty thrash band in 1988. Perfect.

The art in the book is a huge leap forward. He has taken a scratchy approach to many of the textures. I always thought I preferred his use of fat lines but have totally been proven wrong here. The mountains, the sand, the jizz exoskeleton all have a proper weight to them.

The only problem I had was in the panels where he is conveying motion with a doubling of figures and motion lines. It doesn’t feel smooth or fast, it feels clunky. This only occurs a few times in the book and only slows it down a touch for me, though.

The constant careful working of the electrical subterranean sky paid off in creating an oppressive atmosphere. The bleakness of the landscape is evoked nicely with skulls and spiky headed corpses nailed to cactuses and the remains of long dead warriors scattered about the desert floor.
The story definitely puts the GORE in phantasmagorical as characters twist and mutated into strange new forms while pounding the stuffing out of each other. The plot is very straight forward and simplistic, which is great because all we need as readers is an excuse for getting the pleasure of seeing how disgusting and depraved Johnny Ryan can get. I mean, would you really want to hear GG Allin singing free jazz? Well…some of us would but not many.

The sequence where the animated intestines of one of his futuristic prison guards encases the prisoner/protagonist in a sausagy cocoon is as “spaghetti and meatballs” as the best of Basil Wolverton. I did flips on the subway reading that section as the violence escalated putting attitude atop action then repeating and layering. The rendering of the meaty encasement was perfect and his freeing of self by blasting through the bloody mulch of the ripped tendrils was absolutely disgusting in the best and most bad assed way!

Each encounter with a foe kicks the disgusting and strangeness factors up a notch. Like the works of filmmaker, Takashi Miike, there is a violence to his imagery that transcends even the very idea of violence. Pain is impetus for transformation, nothing more. The physicality supercedes all moral compasses. Only the act of metamorphosis and growth is holy. The protagonist is reborn time and again through blood and semen.

Put plain, in Prison Pit, Ryan creates art out of the steaming piles of human waste that litter our cultural landscape. The bodies and excrement are grist for his mill. He erects mountains of shit and semen, carving the faces of sacred cows in them, and then sets them afire so even if you can’t see the work… you can smell it from miles away.


Jared Gniewek
has worked in the music industry as a back line technician, performer, and promoter. He has also been a freelance writer whose work can be seen in the recent re-launch of Tales from the Crypt and heard on The Dark Sense, an audio anthology of the macabre for which he is also the story editor. Jared’s blog, Die By The Pen, outlines his philosophies and personal quest as a writer while he also masterminds a demented karoake game called Scary-Oke.

Influencing Comics #2: Tom Hart on Mamet and Herzog

David Mamet and Werner Herzog are the Apollo and Dionysis of movie-making. Forgive me, I'm pitting them against each other partially because they've each created works I adore, but also because Mamet himself has in essence already done so.

Mamet's book, "On Directing Film" has been passed around by cartoonists and teachers since its publication because the book is so clearly dedicated to telling stories. Mamet goes out of his way to insist that the filmmaker's job is to construct a situation where the viewer constantly wants to know what happens next. The purpose of every scene, every dialogue, every "shot", is to further the drama. Mamet calls Dumbo a perfect movie, rates Frank Capra among the best movie makers, and thinks the function of most actors is to say their lines and little else. He's not at all wrong, if you subcribe to Mamet's value system: that the drama is the thing. Keep the viewer on the edge of their seat. They want to know what happens next. Your job is to keep them interested. They want to piece together your story if you respect them, they want to watch the arc of the characters as those characters fall apart or come together.

Mamet has little use for anything that distracts from the director's elucidation of the drama. He doesn't even like actors to act. To be a filmmaker is to be a crafter of dramas and stories that the viewers engage in, through the power of dialogue and shots that are conceived, staged, filmed, and wrapped up.

I love Mamet's book. It's an arrogant, self-satisfied book, so laser-focused on telling a story that anyone in any medium will benefit from it. In detailed conversations with students and illuminating supporting essays, he describes what kinds of shots and scenes move a story forward, and which ones don't. If scenes and shots don't move the story forward, they're of no use.

In my mulitple readings of the book, I can only recall him mentioning one director by name who represents the type of filmmaking he has no use for: Werner Herzog. He says: "... listen to the difference between the way people talk about films by Werner Herzog and the way they talk about films by Frank Capra, for example. One of them may or may not understand something or other, but the other understands what it is to tell a story, and he wants to tell a story, which is the nature of the dramatic art- to tell a story." Mamet finishes this line of thinking with "The only thing the dramatic form is good for is telling a story."

I'm not sure what Mamet's even trying to say in the first part of that excerpt, but I know what he's missing in the second part: film isn't merely a dramatic form. It may be partially that, but it's also a visual form. This is what Herzog understands (and maybe Mamet, in a rare bout of inarticulateness is trying to say this when he says "understanding something or other".)

Herzog, meanwhile, has consistently made movies -dramas, in fact- with vivid, stunning imagery, powerful performances and real moments that barely seem like they could have been caught on film at all. To Mamet's eyes, Herzog may frequently deviate from his story, or horror-of-horrors, not know his story before hand, but in fact, Herzog's story has always the gigantic, grand story of being earthbound and alive. His movies will dwell, linger on images much longer than any dramatist would allow. He stages and shoots accidents, finds resonance in side action, and used as his primary actor a man who was barely controllable on or off camera.

Herzog wasn't, like Mamet, interested in "telling a story", as much as getting the story to stand still long enough to be appear on film. Even in his filmed fictions, Herzog shot them like documentaries and was interested in finding the the human stories within their core. Unlike Mamet's, Herzog's scripts were often only a few pages long, vague outlines of scenes that need to happen. Herzog stages the scenes, creates the conditions for the scenes to unfold and films them. Herzog needs actors: Klaus Kinski's unpredictable nature made his rage and mania on camera more powerful than you could write or predict beforehand. Where Mamet would use dialogue and a careful organization of shots to make his points, Herzog would create conditions to get his actors to be human on camera.

Herzog has shot at least as many documentaries as he has fiction films. In both, he's looking for stories and imagery. In his late-career manifesto he says:

"There are few images to be found. One has to dig for them like an archaeologist. One has to search through this ravaged landscape to find anything at all... I see so few people today who dare to address our lack of adequate images. We absolutely need images in tune with our civilization, images that resonate with what is deepest within us... to find images that are pure and clear and transparent."

Mamet has said that one should never "rush immediately to visual or pictorial solutions." Herzog is not guilty of this. Where Mamet finds a Dionysian joy in writing the dialogue, in the crafting of language that illuminates his structured, mechanistic list of shots, Herzog is looking with his camera for what he calls "ecstatic truth." The solutions Mamet talks about are to the problems of drama, but those are not Herzog's main concerns.

I adore both creators. Everyone I know has a favorite Mamet line or two of dialogue. (" Put that coffee down! Coffee is for closers!") But I'll pick up Mamet's gauntlet and be a "person talking about the films of Werner Herzog and the films of Frank Capra":

Capra made some powerful, humane stories that linger long in the public imagination. In my casual conversations full of subjectivity and laziness, I'd call Mr. Smith Goes to Washington and It's a Wonderful Life "pretty great." But in the same context, to talk about Herzog, particularly Signs of Life, Aguirre, Fitzcarraldo, Stroszek, Nosferatu and most of his documentaries, I start talking about being confronted, overwhelmed and devastated by emotion, imagery and yes, story of human struggle and potential.

All my career I've obsessed with a dichotomy between what I call drama and poetry. The inclination more towards story or towards imagery that exists outside of it's dramatic context .

The Mamet/Herzog polarity is this same dichotomy. "What Happens Next" vs "Ecstatic Truth." As a creator, I value both, I need to understand both, but I have always wound up running to the latter side. All my career, as creator and audience I've found myself drawn to where the rage, the physicality and the beauty goes untethered. I love messy, reckless creators whose highs are gigantic peaks and whose lows are sometimes Icarus-like failures. Werner Herzog, Kate Bush, Jack Kirby, Philip K. Dick.

These artists traffic in what I'm most interested in, things that there aren't premeditated shot-lists for: poetry, power, ecstasy and the unnamable, dormant forces within us waiting to be released.

c.2009 Tom Hart


Tom Hart is creator of Hutch Owen graphic novels and comic strips, critically acclaimed by The Comics Journal, Time.com, Publishers Weekly and the Library Journal.

He has taught for 8 years at School of Visual Arts, and in that time has taught at Parsons, Education Alliance, Young Audiences, the 92nd St Y and numerous places across the country and all over New York City.